Had Mr. Ravi set up the webcam because
Nike Air Max he had a pretty good idea that he would see Mr. Clementi in an intimate moment? Had he targeted Mr. Clementi and the man he was with because they were gay? And had Mr. Clementi been in fear?Without Mr.
Air Yeezy Shoes Clementi to speak for himself, that last question was perhaps the most difficult to determine, and jurors struggled with it.“That was the hardest because you really can’t get into someone’s head,” said one, Bruno Ferreira, as he left the court. The jury deliberated longest — for well more than an hour, he said — on the bias intimidation charge.Mr. Ferreira said he ultimately voted guilty on the bias intimidation charge because Mr. Ravi had sent multiple
Air Yeezy Glow In The Dark Twitter messages about Mr. Clementi.“They were being done twice, not just one day,” he said.Another juror, Kashad Leverett, himself a student and a Twitter user, said he could relate to Mr. Ravi’s constant stream of Twitter and text messages. But the defense’s insistence that Mr. Ravi had set up the webcam because he was afraid Mr. Clementi’s boyfriend would steal something, he said, rang hollow.“If I knew someone was going to steal something from me, I would definitely take it with me,” Mr. Leverett said, adding, “Just from the fact of the second incident, it seemed that it was intentional.”The jury of seven women and five men deliberated for 13 hours over 3 days after 13 days of testimony. Reflecting the difficulty of defining hate crimes, it had taken the judge more than an hour simply to instruct the jury on the questions they had to answer to reach a verdict.The jury concluded that Mr. Ravi had not knowingly or purposely intimidated the men when he watched the first time, on Sept. 19,
Air Yeezys 2010. But it found him guilty of the charge because Mr. Clementi “reasonably believed” he had been made a target because he was gay.